summer, in the form of a short list:
true blood
iced coffee
reading, reading, reading
slow mornings
france
orange laughter
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
moonrise kingdom
article source: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/05/24/PKM61OLCDP.DTL
This article gave some details about the new Wes Anderson movie, Moonrise Kingdom that was just released in select theaters this past weekend (after being shown at the Cannes Film Festival previously). Anderson commented that he has been heavily influenced by French New Wave (specifically Truffaut) and despite the fact that many consider his films to be heavily dependent on his specific style, Anderson would rather not be known for repetition. The article touches on common themes in Anderson's films - peculiar characters, familiar cast members (the cast for Moonrise Kingdom including Bruce Willis, Edward Norton, Frances McDormand,Bill Murray and Jason Schwartzman) and specific scriptwriting. The plot of the Moonrise includes young adolescent love, stealing library books, and Khaki Scouts, but the rest of the story remains fairly mysterious.
I picked this article because 1) I love Wes Anderson! 2) I am planning to see Moonrise Kingdom eventually 3) I've already watched the trailer a few too many times
The article was informative, and I learned that Roman Coppola helped write the script as well as helping to write the script for Sophia Coppola's Somewhere (which I also love).
This article gave some details about the new Wes Anderson movie, Moonrise Kingdom that was just released in select theaters this past weekend (after being shown at the Cannes Film Festival previously). Anderson commented that he has been heavily influenced by French New Wave (specifically Truffaut) and despite the fact that many consider his films to be heavily dependent on his specific style, Anderson would rather not be known for repetition. The article touches on common themes in Anderson's films - peculiar characters, familiar cast members (the cast for Moonrise Kingdom including Bruce Willis, Edward Norton, Frances McDormand,Bill Murray and Jason Schwartzman) and specific scriptwriting. The plot of the Moonrise includes young adolescent love, stealing library books, and Khaki Scouts, but the rest of the story remains fairly mysterious.
I picked this article because 1) I love Wes Anderson! 2) I am planning to see Moonrise Kingdom eventually 3) I've already watched the trailer a few too many times
The article was informative, and I learned that Roman Coppola helped write the script as well as helping to write the script for Sophia Coppola's Somewhere (which I also love).
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
Escape from camp 14
article source: http://theweek.com/article/index/228631/inside-north-koreas-gulag
7 years ago, at the age of 23, Shin In Geun escaped from a North Korean political prison. That statement alone is enough to merit astonishment, as previously no one born in a camp had been known to escape. While the article itself does not provide detail of his escape, it hints at the perseverance of the escape in reciting time limits: a month found him in China, two years found him in South Korea, and 4 years found him in Southern California. More astonishing, however, is the bit of life from inside the camp that Shin In Geun reveals. It is a life that reflects a horrifying lack of basic family ties and mutual respect for human life. Shin grew up as a slave, under the pressure of survival that led to his betrayal of his mother and brother in their plan to escape the camp. Once he relayed this information, however, Shin was tortured for information anyways and eventually witnessed the hanging of his own mother and brother. What Shin wished to relay to the outside world, however, was not the terror of his own personal experience but the level of deasement within the camps, and the truth that the abuse within them came not only from the guards, but between the prisoners themselves.
I found this article in the back of the magazine The Week, which I get at home. I chose the article because of the subtitle:
7 years ago, at the age of 23, Shin In Geun escaped from a North Korean political prison. That statement alone is enough to merit astonishment, as previously no one born in a camp had been known to escape. While the article itself does not provide detail of his escape, it hints at the perseverance of the escape in reciting time limits: a month found him in China, two years found him in South Korea, and 4 years found him in Southern California. More astonishing, however, is the bit of life from inside the camp that Shin In Geun reveals. It is a life that reflects a horrifying lack of basic family ties and mutual respect for human life. Shin grew up as a slave, under the pressure of survival that led to his betrayal of his mother and brother in their plan to escape the camp. Once he relayed this information, however, Shin was tortured for information anyways and eventually witnessed the hanging of his own mother and brother. What Shin wished to relay to the outside world, however, was not the terror of his own personal experience but the level of deasement within the camps, and the truth that the abuse within them came not only from the guards, but between the prisoners themselves.
I found this article in the back of the magazine The Week, which I get at home. I chose the article because of the subtitle:
Twisted by hunger and cruelty, Shin In Geun betrayed his mother, and then watched her hang
It kind of jumps out at you. In any case, though, the article was well written and emphasized the fact that the level of deprivation inside these camps is illustrated in the way that it has turned its inhabitants against each other, and forced them into a less-than-human state of being and mentality. I found the story itself to be very interesting, if only in light of the fact that there is so little overall information about North Korea.Sunday, June 3, 2012
senior reflection TWO
Went to see Joe Pug in concert last night! He is the coolest.
With 5 (!) days left, I can't help but think about the future.
Joe has this one song called "I Do My Father's Drugs"
my favorite part goes like this:
if you see me with a rifle
don't ask me what it's for
I fight my father's war
Leaving home for the first time and everything makes you wonder about how much of you is you and how much of it is where you've grown up and the beliefs of your parents or your peers. Maybe sometimes we don't even know when we're fighting someone else's war. Are we condemned to fight the same things because of the way we're made? And yet.
With 5 (!) days left, I can't help but think about the future.
Joe has this one song called "I Do My Father's Drugs"
my favorite part goes like this:
if you see me with a rifle
don't ask me what it's for
I fight my father's war
Leaving home for the first time and everything makes you wonder about how much of you is you and how much of it is where you've grown up and the beliefs of your parents or your peers. Maybe sometimes we don't even know when we're fighting someone else's war. Are we condemned to fight the same things because of the way we're made? And yet.
You're rocking the boat
article source: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2012/05/on-censorship-salman-rushdie.html
This article was technically a lecture given by Salman Rushdie, but republished in print I think it remains interesting. "On Censorship" is an account, an analyzation, on the complex relationship bewteen art and censorship - although in truth Rushdie paints the picture as much more black and white: creation and its inherent opposite. He considers liberty, freedom, and the ability to create comparable to the air we breathe, asserting that this freedom is fragile enough to require "not only freedom but also this assumption of freedom". We must, in other words, have confidence in the longevity of our freedom as well. So, with this fragility he considers the darkness that is censorship - the change in meaning that is "censored art", the political impacts of censorship in China, the effects on individual artists when work is banned. He warns, ultimately, against shying away from those artists and their creations that seem to rock the boat. Originality, he says, is dangerous, and it's important that we defend it.
I don't really even read the New Yorker regularly, but I did try to read Salman Rushie once, and while I never finished his book I liked the bit that I did read. Rushdie has a truly amazing way with metaphor, and I agree with a great deal of what he spoke about in this lecure. At the same time though, he classifies creation and censorship as "thing" and "no-thing", asserting that censorship is the absence of presence - but censorship has to be more than just absence. The act of trying to erase something is in itself a statement, not merely the absence of it. Words that have been crossed out do not simply cease to exist. He also relies a great deal on the fragility of artists, which, while romantic, feels a bit patronizing, and denies art some due complexity.
This article was technically a lecture given by Salman Rushdie, but republished in print I think it remains interesting. "On Censorship" is an account, an analyzation, on the complex relationship bewteen art and censorship - although in truth Rushdie paints the picture as much more black and white: creation and its inherent opposite. He considers liberty, freedom, and the ability to create comparable to the air we breathe, asserting that this freedom is fragile enough to require "not only freedom but also this assumption of freedom". We must, in other words, have confidence in the longevity of our freedom as well. So, with this fragility he considers the darkness that is censorship - the change in meaning that is "censored art", the political impacts of censorship in China, the effects on individual artists when work is banned. He warns, ultimately, against shying away from those artists and their creations that seem to rock the boat. Originality, he says, is dangerous, and it's important that we defend it.
I don't really even read the New Yorker regularly, but I did try to read Salman Rushie once, and while I never finished his book I liked the bit that I did read. Rushdie has a truly amazing way with metaphor, and I agree with a great deal of what he spoke about in this lecure. At the same time though, he classifies creation and censorship as "thing" and "no-thing", asserting that censorship is the absence of presence - but censorship has to be more than just absence. The act of trying to erase something is in itself a statement, not merely the absence of it. Words that have been crossed out do not simply cease to exist. He also relies a great deal on the fragility of artists, which, while romantic, feels a bit patronizing, and denies art some due complexity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)